Can the concept of security be defined should it be Essay

Can the opinion of hostage be defined should it be - test ExampleIn addition, while there is an agreement on the broadening agenda of security measure, incriminate elaborateness of the concept, hinders intellectual coherence of the concept and the security field. More importantly, the remaining importance of the question of war and hysteria under international anarchy cannot be ignored. This paper begins by questioning what security is and identifying its conceptual difficulties. This includes an interrogative sentence of conflicting theories in Security Studies. Secondly, the narrow concept of security defined by traditional possibleness developed during the frore War is discussed. Thirdly, proponents in favour of extending the concept of security in more point in time are examined as well as the different dimensions of security challenging traditional concepts. Fourthly, limitations arising out of undiscriminating expansion of the concept are examined. Fifthly, a critica l analysis of contemporary discourse which comes across as Eurocentric will be conducted. In this regard, the need for the strong and the weak in the same place setting is suggested. Finally, a conclusion is provided suggesting that relational thinking should be applied to security studies. Introduction Security studies dramatically developed in response to the development and spread of nuclear weapons and the corresponding conflicts between two superpowers during the frigidity War influencing the growth of international relations (IR) theory. After World War (WW) II, the nuclear arms career between the US and the former Soviet Union produced myriad strategical concepts characterized by the balance of power, bipolar world, containment and deterrence comprising the major issues during the Cold War. Realist theory emerged dominating IR, displacing the earlier emphasis on international impartiality and organisations. Rational problem solving emphasizes scientifically calculating i nterest, cost and the best alternatives. The central question for strategists during the Cold War was how states could states could use weapons of mass destruction as policy instruments, given the risk of nuclear transposition (Walt, 1991, p.214). Cold War security discourse therefore required a reflection of the immediate domain and as a result, historical and ethnic contexts were largely ignored or relegated to low politics. For example strategic theory failed to satisfactorily explain theVietnam War as there was little attention to Vietnamese cultural context and instead relied on expectations that the Vietnamese adversary would conform to academic models (Kolodziej, 2005, p.23). With the collapse of the former Soviet Union and thus the end of the Cold War, low politics gained currency, commanding the adoption of a vernal concept of security by expanding on the traditional concept. Thus, in 1994 the UNDP advocated for a transition from nuclear security to human security which included issues such as hunger, disease and repression, and protection from sudden and hurtful disruptions. In 1995, the International military commission on Global Governance recommended that international security must be reconceptualised to direct attention to the security of people and the planet. In other words, difficulties for mankind generally or specific communities are now conceptualized as security risks. Changes in the past have resulted in changes in conditions and thus have corresponded with changes relative to the concept of securit